Tag Archives: music industry

Sexism permeates every layer of the music industry – new report echoes what research has been saying for years

Image free of licensing under CC0 1.0 Deed CC0 1.0 Universal

Laura Hamer, The Open University

The landmark Misogyny in Music report from British MPs on the women and equalities committee, published on January 30, shines an unsettling light upon the gender discrimination, sexual harassment and abuse which is rampant across the music industry.

The cross-party inquiry heard evidence from a wide range of witnesses connected to the music industry. The findings are deeply disturbing, highlighting that women working within the industry face “limitations in opportunity, a lack of support, gender discrimination and sexual harassment and assault as well as the persistent issue of unequal pay in a sector dominated by self-employment and gendered power imbalances”.

The report calls out the widespread misuse of non-disclosure agreements, which silence victims and protect perpetrators, meaning that: “People in the industry who attend award shows and parties currently do so sitting alongside sexual abusers who remain protected by the system and by colleagues.” The inquiry also found that the issues are “intensified for women faced with intersectional barriers, particularly racial discrimination”.

This report follows a raft of recent investigations into discrimination within the music industry.

A culture of discrimination

In September 2022 the Independent Society of Musicians published its report, Dignity At Work 2: Discrimination in the Music Sector. The report was based on survey responses from 660 people in the music industry.

It found that 66% had experienced some form of discrimination and 78% of that discrimination was committed against women. Of the discrimination, 58% was identified as sexual harassment, with 76% of workers within studio or live music event settings having experienced discrimination. It also found that 88% of self-employed respondents did not report the discrimination which they had experienced (94% had nobody to report it to).

Important recent research reports have also been produced by Black Lives in Music, Donne Women in Music and Women in CTRL. The findings also echo a number of the themes which have emerged through the work of the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)-funded Women’s Musical Leadership Online Network, which I lead with Professor Helen Julia Minors of York St John University.

Further problems for the industry

Gender discrimination permeates every layer of the music industry. Although representation of women has increased in recent years, men still dominate leadership roles.

The persistent gendered associations of certain musical instruments and genres still prevent women from taking them up or performing them professionally at the same rates as men. Historically, women were encouraged to play “ladylike” instruments, such as the piano or harp, whereas wind and brass instruments – which require the distortion of the facial muscles – were strongly discouraged, as were the lower strings and percussion.

Although many of these historical restrictions have evaporated, they linger on in the present day for the drums, bass guitar and brass. Jazz, heavy metal and rap (despite having many women artists) are still often seen as masculine genres.

Photo by cottonbro studio

The industry remains male-dominated and beset with unequal working practices. Many of those working within it are self-employed, working on precarious contracts which often involve antisocial hours without the same protections as those working for companies.

Self-employed musician-mothers are often unable to take maternity leave of any significant length and childcare costs are exorbitant. The sexualised reception and constant scrutiny in media and social media endured by women within the music industry is exhausting, threatening and degrading. The widespread sexual abuse and harassment which so many women are subjected to is a shameful open secret.

The Misogyny in Music report is an urgent call for change.

Recommendations from the report

The report includes 34 recommendations. It calls upon the government to legislate to “ensure freelance workers are provided with the same protections from discrimination as employees”. It also asks for an amendment to section 14 of the Equality Act “to improve protections for people facing intersectional inequality”.

The report urges the government to “bring forward legislative proposals to prohibit the use of non-disclosure and other forms of confidentiality agreements in cases involving sexual abuse, sexual harassment or sexual misconduct, bullying or harassment, and discrimination relating to a protected characteristic” (characteristics protected by the Equality Act, such as age and race). It also suggests a retrospective moratorium on those already in place.

The report signals the establishment of a new Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority (CIISA) to act as “a single, recognisable body that anyone in the industry can turn to for support and advice”.

It considers the additional requirements which it would be useful to introduce for spaces within which it is known that abuse takes place, recommending that studios and music venues, the security staff that work at them, and artist managers should all be licensed.

What’s clear from the report is that the behaviour of men lies at the heart of these issues. Preventative measures, however, risk normalising these kinds of behaviour because they place the burden of responsibility on women to avoid becoming victims. Alongside legislative reforms, a deep cultural change is needed within the music industry to ensure it becomes a safer, inclusive and supportive space for women.


Laura Hamer, Senior Lecturer in Music, The Open University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

EU Parliament calls for overhaul of streaming industry

Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have called for a major overhaul of the music streaming industry to address the disparities in revenue allocation among performers.

The European Parliament is looking at a revision of pre-digital royalty rates.

Recently, MEPs voted in favour of setting up a new EU legal framework to ensure artists are fairly compensated.

One of the major proposals in the vote is the revision of pre-digital royalty rates to allow for fair pay of authors. The other is the scrapping of payment schemes that force authors to accept lower or no revenues in exchange for greater visibility.

The resolution also called for European musical works to be visible, prominent and accessible on streaming services, with a hint at potential quotas to enforce this.

The lawmakers also want digital service providers to “make their algorithms and recommendation tools transparent and to add labels to any tracks that are AI-generated.”

While the resolution itself is non-legislative, industry insiders say the vote serves as a plea for the European Commission to acknowledge the main concerns around music streaming and initiate legislation to address it.

The European Parliament has received praise for the vote, with many stakeholders terming it as timely.

The European Independent Music Companies Association (IMPALA) welcomed the vote, with executive chair Helen Smith saying the call for modern digital rates is preferable in her members’ eyes to “so-called new ‘equitable remuneration’ rights which some parts of the sector are calling for.”

The European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (GESAC) has also applauded the vote, calling it “a strong signal of recognition and understanding of the needs of creators.”

Spanish politician Ibán García del Blanco praised the European Parliament for giving a voice to the concerns of European creators, who are at the heart of the music streaming market.

“Cultural diversity and ensuring that authors are credited and fairly paid has always been our priority,” he said. “This is why we ask for rules that ensure algorithms and recommendation tools used by music streaming services are transparent as well as in their use of AI tools, placing European authors at the centre.”

In recent years, streaming services have come under pressure to introduce better terms for artists whose music appears on their platforms. In November, Spotify announced that it would introduce changes to its royalty payments from early 2024, including a policy that requires tracks to achieve a minimum of 1 000 plays every year in order to receive royalties, a move that has been criticised widely.


This article was originally published by In-house East Africa on the musicainafrica.com website, on January 23rd 2024, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialCC BY-NC licence.

Spotify CEO Sets New Standards Of How To Abuse Creative People

The CEO billionaire of the music streaming platform Spotify, Daniel Ek, recently stated in an interview that:

“a “narrative fallacy” had been created and caused music fans to believe that Spotify doesn’t pay musicians enough for streams of their music. “Some artists that used to do well in the past may not do well in this future landscape,” Ek said, “where you can’t record music once every three to four years and think that’s going to be enough.””

Many artists have disagreed in the past to Spotify’s business model. Canadian singer Esthero included a protest message in one of her singles and UK musician and writer Steve Lawson had this to say about the interview with Daniel Ek:

“What’s worth noting is that there is, however, a REALLY interesting conversation to be had about creativity, work rate, product vs process, aesthetics, the affordances of releasing stuff digital-only. It’s just that the billionaire who’s lobbying to pay musicians and songwriters less can fuck off out of it.

There are few people on the planet whose opinion on ‘what musicians should do’ I hold in lower regard than Daniel Ek. Like, Trump-level irrelevance as an opinion holder on anything.

Once again for the people at the back – fuck this guy.”

Some people weighed in on the matter emphasizing how the music industry is quickly turning into a world of quantity over quality:

As we wrote in a previous article here on Shouts it is “well known how badly Spotify and many other streaming services pay the creators for streamed or bought music. That is excluding though, a handful of services like Bandcamp, for example, who don’t charge a penny for streaming but instead make their money from revenue share on sales.”

Somehow though, when journalists make up graphs and images or write about streaming services they seem to always leave Bandcamp out of their ‘research’.

Thom Yorke once stated that Spotify was “the last desperate fart of a dying corpse”. I hope his prediction proves correct.

✊ ✊ ✊ ✊