Tag Archives: women’s rights

I contributed to the Misogyny In Music report – it’s sadly unsurprising that its recommendations have been rejected

Photo by cottonbro studio

Sally Anne Gross, University of Westminster

The Misogyny In Music report, published in January 2024 by the Women And Equalities Committee, was the first major report into the working conditions of women and girls working across the UK music sector.

The scope of the report, which I contributed to, was ambitious. It covered performers, songwriters, audio engineers, major music companies and institutions and both classical and popular music education. The report revealed the level of inequality across the music supply chain and the sexism, misogyny, bullying and sexual abuse that women and girls experienced in their working lives.

As part of the report, back in September 2023, the BBC broadcaster DJ and author Annie Macmanus (better known as Annie Mac) gave evidence to the House of Commons committee, calling the music business a “boys’ club” that is “rigged against women”.

The report was widely heralded as a turning point. Finally, the boys’ club of the music industry was laid bare. But on Friday, April 19, the government issued its response to the report’s recommendations – a wholesale rejection.


This article is part of our State of the Arts series. These articles tackle the challenges of the arts and heritage industry – and celebrate the wins, too.


With the publication of the report and its recommendations, it seemed for a moment as if women’s needs might be being addressed given the cross-party support the committee had garnered.

The recommendations called for legislative change to increase protection for women in several different areas: from amending the Equalities Act to provide freelancers the same rights as employees, to prohibiting the use of nondisclosure agreements “in cases involving … sexual abuse, sexual harassment or sexual misconduct”.

The government argues that there are already legal safeguards in place that make nondisclosure agreements unenforceable if they are used in order to protect perpetrators.

Other recommendations include: reform of parental leave to include freelancers, that public funding and licensing of music venues should be made conditional on those premises taking steps to tackle gender bias, sexual harassment and abuse. In terms of education, the report recommends investment in training for women in areas such as audio engineering where the gender imbalance is particularly acute. The report further recommends education for school children and specifically boys “on issues of misogyny, sexual harassment and gender-based violence”.

So why did the government reject the recommendations?

Annie Mac | Radio 1’s Free Party at Ushuaia Ibiza Beach Hotel by radio1interactive

The government’s response

The government’s argument was that there is no need for additional action, because action is already in play. It said: “This response has set out the many initiatives that the government is taking forward or the policies that are currently in place to provide legal protections for women in the workforce, including in the music industry.”

The response from women and commentators across the music industry has been one of great disappointment and almost disbelief.

“It’s incredibly disheartening to hear the government deny the reality of the endemic misogyny and discrimination that women face in the UK music industry”, said Nadia Khan, the founder of the charity Women in CTRL.

But should we be surprised by this government’s response? As a woman and a mother who has been working in the UK music industry for over 30 years I can say from personal experience it’s been – at best – frustrating and exhausting.

How the industry treats women

Sexism and misogyny are a daily occurrence in the industry. In 1993, I became the first woman to be appointed as an artists and repertoire manager (A&R) at Mercury Records UK. A&R is one of the most prestigious roles in any record label.

On my first day, all the men – even the ones I knew – stared silently through their office blinds as I walked into my office. Not one came out to greet me. I felt I was not considered one of them. Now there are women working in music companies in all kinds of positions from A&R to heads of departments, but they are still not treated as equal to men, as the report clearly found.

I have now been teaching in a music department of a university for nearly two decades. I have seen how slow the process of change is and how resistant institutions can be to change.

Those who contributed to the report are disappointed that the government has rejected its recommendations. Photo by Marlene Leppänen

When I started teaching, just as when I started out as a music manager and independent record label owner, I was surrounded by men. As a woman in the industry, you become accustomed to coping; managing either by being invisible and unheard or deflecting unwanted advances and patronising comments with humour and a smile. Sometimes you just lose your temper, and sometimes you make a quick getaway.

In 2016 I became a researcher focusing on the impact of inequalities on mental health and the working conditions of the music industries. My co-author and researcher George Musgrave and I published our research in two reports for the charity Help Musicians UK, and a book entitled Can Music Make You Sick? Measuring the Price of Musical Ambition (2020). In it, we examined the relationship between poor working conditions and bad mental health.

We were honoured to contribute to the Misogyny In Music report. We, like everybody else that contributed, were hoping that the data would count and that legislative action for change would follow. The government response is disappointing, to say the least. Are we surprised? No. But we will we keep on fighting.


Sally Anne Gross, Reader in Music Business, University of Westminster

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

New database tracks gender equality projects within the European music industry

The brand new project, which was launched just this week, tracks and catalogues networks that tackle gender equality and equity in the European music industry.

Snapshot from the GENiE website.

The project, called GENiE (Gender Equality Networks in Europe), already has catalogued over 300 networks in 25 countries. On the project website one can look up networks by country or project type (festival, management, radio, community, safe spaces, record labels, workshops, etc.). For now, the project is focused on European networks and designed to motivate cross border collaborations, inspire people to get involved in the music industry in their own countries and showing the paths to do so.

The project was founded by Grace Goodwin, an academic researcher and session drummer from the UK. According to Grace, “geography and regionality can influence the career progression and experiences of women”.

Among the listings one can find in the database are projects that fight for better representation for women, publish job, management and learning opportunities, music festivals representing women and much more.

The project already landed a big, official supporter in the online music service Soundcloud. In an interview with the streaming service and music community Goodwin is quoted saying that there is still a lot of progress to be made. We caught up with Grace via email and asked her a few questions about her project and her academic work within the music industry.

What is your background in the music industry and how did you come up with Genie?

I trained as a session drummer and percussionist at university. I then studied a masters in music industry which led me to advising artists and supporting their work through mentoring. Like most people in the industry I have had many jobs which have included teacher, record label manager, workshop leader etc. I am currently focusing my time on a PhD where I am researching gender equity in the music industry, which also offered some of the inspiration for GENIE.

Can you tell me a bit about your academic background as well? What are some of the things you have researched or published?

I started my PhD in 2023 so I’m considered in the early stages of academia! My research focuses on gender equity with my PhD focusing on regional gender inequality – how where a woman is based can affect her career progression in the music industry. GENIE has recently opened up new doors with research and I am now widening my scope to research in Europe and looking for potential collaborators. I’m hoping to start publishing work during my PhD. I am passionate about delivering research which has tangible outcomes which can make real change in the industry.

I know the project is in the very early stages, but have you gotten any feedback yet from the music community?

The feedback so far has been amazing, I was scared to put it out into the world in case people didn’t really engage with it but I’ve had lots of people get in touch to add their projects since the launch. A lot of people have told me that it has allowed them to find new projects in their own country which is great. I think it is the type of project that will build over time as it becomes more visible.

What do you hope to see this project grow into, in the future? What possibilities do you imagine and what changes do you dream of?

This is something I am really starting to think about as I had to get over the hurdle of launching it first! I think that it is an amazing resource for networking and collaboration so I think these will be some of the wider goals of the project. Maybe organising networking events around major festivals and conferences. Also I want to act as an advocate for these projects- understanding their issues, funding models, best practice; Collating this in some way to then inform cultural policy and support. And now that I am aware of over 350 projects across Europe I want to keep connecting people! The ideal change would be where the type of work I do would no longer need to exist! 

Sexism permeates every layer of the music industry – new report echoes what research has been saying for years

Image free of licensing under CC0 1.0 Deed CC0 1.0 Universal

Laura Hamer, The Open University

The landmark Misogyny in Music report from British MPs on the women and equalities committee, published on January 30, shines an unsettling light upon the gender discrimination, sexual harassment and abuse which is rampant across the music industry.

The cross-party inquiry heard evidence from a wide range of witnesses connected to the music industry. The findings are deeply disturbing, highlighting that women working within the industry face “limitations in opportunity, a lack of support, gender discrimination and sexual harassment and assault as well as the persistent issue of unequal pay in a sector dominated by self-employment and gendered power imbalances”.

The report calls out the widespread misuse of non-disclosure agreements, which silence victims and protect perpetrators, meaning that: “People in the industry who attend award shows and parties currently do so sitting alongside sexual abusers who remain protected by the system and by colleagues.” The inquiry also found that the issues are “intensified for women faced with intersectional barriers, particularly racial discrimination”.

This report follows a raft of recent investigations into discrimination within the music industry.

A culture of discrimination

In September 2022 the Independent Society of Musicians published its report, Dignity At Work 2: Discrimination in the Music Sector. The report was based on survey responses from 660 people in the music industry.

It found that 66% had experienced some form of discrimination and 78% of that discrimination was committed against women. Of the discrimination, 58% was identified as sexual harassment, with 76% of workers within studio or live music event settings having experienced discrimination. It also found that 88% of self-employed respondents did not report the discrimination which they had experienced (94% had nobody to report it to).

Important recent research reports have also been produced by Black Lives in Music, Donne Women in Music and Women in CTRL. The findings also echo a number of the themes which have emerged through the work of the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)-funded Women’s Musical Leadership Online Network, which I lead with Professor Helen Julia Minors of York St John University.

Further problems for the industry

Gender discrimination permeates every layer of the music industry. Although representation of women has increased in recent years, men still dominate leadership roles.

The persistent gendered associations of certain musical instruments and genres still prevent women from taking them up or performing them professionally at the same rates as men. Historically, women were encouraged to play “ladylike” instruments, such as the piano or harp, whereas wind and brass instruments – which require the distortion of the facial muscles – were strongly discouraged, as were the lower strings and percussion.

Although many of these historical restrictions have evaporated, they linger on in the present day for the drums, bass guitar and brass. Jazz, heavy metal and rap (despite having many women artists) are still often seen as masculine genres.

The industry remains male-dominated and beset with unequal working practices. Many of those working within it are self-employed, working on precarious contracts which often involve antisocial hours without the same protections as those working for companies.

Self-employed musician-mothers are often unable to take maternity leave of any significant length and childcare costs are exorbitant. The sexualised reception and constant scrutiny in media and social media endured by women within the music industry is exhausting, threatening and degrading. The widespread sexual abuse and harassment which so many women are subjected to is a shameful open secret.

The Misogyny in Music report is an urgent call for change.

Recommendations from the report

The report includes 34 recommendations. It calls upon the government to legislate to “ensure freelance workers are provided with the same protections from discrimination as employees”. It also asks for an amendment to section 14 of the Equality Act “to improve protections for people facing intersectional inequality”.

The report urges the government to “bring forward legislative proposals to prohibit the use of non-disclosure and other forms of confidentiality agreements in cases involving sexual abuse, sexual harassment or sexual misconduct, bullying or harassment, and discrimination relating to a protected characteristic” (characteristics protected by the Equality Act, such as age and race). It also suggests a retrospective moratorium on those already in place.

The report signals the establishment of a new Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority (CIISA) to act as “a single, recognisable body that anyone in the industry can turn to for support and advice”.

It considers the additional requirements which it would be useful to introduce for spaces within which it is known that abuse takes place, recommending that studios and music venues, the security staff that work at them, and artist managers should all be licensed.

What’s clear from the report is that the behaviour of men lies at the heart of these issues. Preventative measures, however, risk normalising these kinds of behaviour because they place the burden of responsibility on women to avoid becoming victims. Alongside legislative reforms, a deep cultural change is needed within the music industry to ensure it becomes a safer, inclusive and supportive space for women.


Laura Hamer, Senior Lecturer in Music, The Open University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.